Categories
Uncategorized

UTC CG-Series Terminal Arrangements c.1956

UTC’s “CG” ‘commercial grade’ line of transformers were high-quality sealed units made in the 50s and 60s and possibly later. The later ‘red paint’ iterations often have pinout data printed on the cases, but the earlier ‘metal-badge’ versions sometimes do not. Despite the wealth of vintage UTC transformer data already available online, I could not find this particular document on the internet so I have scanned it for y’all. This particular document has a March 1956 date code so i assume that it covers the line at-that-point.

CNTRL-CLICK TO DOWNLOAD 4PP PDF:

Units covered include output transformers CG-2L6, 4L6, 15, 16, 19, 710; power transformers CG-422, 428, 429, 431; bias units CG-315, 316; low-level audio units CG-131, 132, 133, 134, 135, 136, 1347, 140, 141, 233, 235, 333, 433; and power transformers CG33, CG120, CG122, CH124, CG125, CG126, CG300, CG301, CG302, CG303, CG34.

Above: some examples of the varying CG case styles- both with and without pinout data. The terminal board on bottom generally have some data but it is often incomplete.

4 replies on “UTC CG-Series Terminal Arrangements c.1956”

Hello Robert. you are welcome. Regarding the link: i just tried the link and it works as indicated. As I state, control-click on the image in order to download the PDF. I just tried it literally 30 seconds ago and it works fine. CR

Hello,

Thank you for your great site. Lots of interesting items here.

For the UTC terminal arrangement I also tried the ctrl+click instruction, both on an Windows machine and one using Ubuntu. Unfortunately it did not work for me, either.

After some detective work, I found this link:
https://www.preservationsound.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/05/UTC-CG-DATA-1957.pdf

Hopefully this link will work for anyone else who is having trouble.

Best Regards,

William

Hi william. yea i only have a mac, and the site works fine on macs, but i can;t say RE: PCs. This site is built on wordpress, which is not well-supported any longer. I would probably have to pay 1000s to a developer to fix it at this point.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.